Skip to main content

Foxcatcher review



The year of my personal delayed reactions continues.  Three of my favorite films this year have taken a day or two to sink in (in some cases a week or more), they took some time and contemplation for me to appreciate how wonderful they were. Frank, Birdman and Foxcatcher were all films that I knew I enjoyed when I left the theater but it took sometime for me to realize the degree to witch I enjoyed them. Some films value diminishes as time passes but the great ones appreciate in value.

Foxcatcher is described as -The greatest Olympic Wrestling Champion brother team joins Team Foxcatcher lead by multimillionaire sponsor John E. du Pont as they train for the 1988 games in Seoul - a union that leads to unlikely circumstances, but that in no way does justice to the film that Bennett Miller has created. Much like his previous film Moneyball, its a movie far better seen than discussed. That's not to say that both films will/have not inspired interesting conversations but that both films are understated character studies and must be seen to be appreciated. 

The acting in the film is across the board spectacular. Steve Carell gives a career best performance as John E du Pont, his characterization of this man while not completely true to the man himself, is brilliantly layered and nuanced. His thoughts are never telegraphed through his words, we given insight through his expressions and posture. Carell gives an incredibly physical performance that unlike his previous work is never really played for laughs. His character is unnerving to watch. Channing Tatum is also giving a breakout performance as Olympic wrestler Mark Schultz. 

If you know where this story is heading it in no way takes away from the pleasure of watching it. This movie isn't about the ending and its not really about the chain of events that propelled these men to their eventual fates. This is a character study. The pleasure of this film is watching the actors.  Don't get me wrong this isn't a light hearted take on some serious material but rather a compelling, deliberately paced decidedly dour examination of three men. 

The true story of John du Pont is well covered and publicized but if you're not familiar with it watch this movie first, then go back and read up on this man. He had a pretty interesting life and to the filmmakers credit this is a part of the story that I was not familiar with at all. Most biopics become a greatest hits of someones life and rarely shed new light on familar events. While this movie only touches on what would eventually become du Ponts legacy it fleshes out that story in an incredibly effective manor. 

I wish I would have seen this film before I compiled my top ten of 2014 because this would have been in the top three if not the #1 spot.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explaining the Ending of MULHOLLAND DRIVE

David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive remains one of the most haunting and enigmatic films ever made. It operates like a riddle that refuses to be solved, luring the viewer into a world where time, memory, and identity dissolve into one another. What begins as a mysterious, almost whimsical Hollywood fairy tale gradually transforms into a psychological nightmare. By the end, it’s clear that what we’ve been watching is not a mystery to be unraveled but an emotional landscape, the mind of a woman caught between fantasy and despair. The film tells the story of two women, Betty Elms and Rita, whose lives intertwine after Rita survives a car crash and loses her memory. Betty, a bright and optimistic aspiring actress freshly arrived in Los Angeles, takes her in. Together, they embark on an investigation into Rita’s identity, which unfolds like a noir detective story bathed in dreamlike light. Everything about this world feels heightened: Betty’s charm, the coincidence of events, and the ease with w...

Explaining the Ending of No Country for Old Men

No Country for Old Men is a tense, spare, and philosophical thriller that upends traditional narrative expectations. While it contains the elements of a crime drama—drug deals, hitmen, shootouts—it refuses to follow a conventional path. By the time the film ends, the central conflict seems unresolved, the villain walks away, and the protagonist we’ve been following disappears offscreen. To understand the film’s ending, one must look beyond plot and consider its themes: fate, violence, moral decay, and the erosion of order in the modern world. The Narrative Setup The story begins with Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin), a Vietnam veteran who discovers a drug deal gone wrong in the Texas desert and makes off with $2 million in cash. Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem), a remorseless hitman, is sent to retrieve the money. Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Tommy Lee Jones), a weary and introspective lawman, tries to make sense of the violence unfolding around him. At first glance, the film appears to set up a c...

Dracula (2026) Trailer, Release Date, Cast, and Plot Details

Dracula (2026) Trailer, Release Date, Cast, and Plot Details Vertical has officially announced that DRACULA (2026), the latest reimagining of the iconic vampire myth, will be released exclusively in theaters nationwide on February 6, 2026. Written, directed, and produced by visionary filmmaker Luc Besson, the film promises a dark, operatic take on one of cinema’s most enduring legends. Dracula (2026) Cast and Creative Team Besson’s Dracula (2026) stars Caleb Landry Jones in the title role, joined by an impressive ensemble that includes Christoph Waltz, Zoë Bleu, Guillaume de Tonquedec, Matilda De Angelis, Ewens Abid, and Raphael Luce. The film is executive produced by Mark Canton, Dorothy Canton, Ryan Winterstern, and Philippe Corrot, further cementing the project as a major cinematic event. Dracula (2026) Plot Synopsis Set against the brutal backdrop of the 15th century, Dracula (2026) begins with profound personal tragedy. After witnessing the savage murder of his beloved wife (Zoë B...