Skip to main content

Internet Trolls and Critics in the Age of Rotten Tomatoes - A Look at the Critical Response to GOTTI

Image
By


Hate, intolerance, and cruelty are the most valued currencies in the digital age. Online publications deal in the same eye-catching tabloid headlines that were once exclusive to rags like WEEKLY WORLD NEWS and the NATIONAL ENQUIRER. The monetization of clicks is ruining many forms of journalism and film criticism is just one of them. When organizations can see what headlines are generating revenue its only natural that sensationalism would start to rise. There is no consorted hivemind like conspiracy to destroy certain films but rather internet activity that has boosted a certain type of writer. From the outside, online film critics share quite a bit with their Twitter troll counterparts.

 The critical response to John Travolta's passion project Gotti has been less than favorable, in fact, it has been downright abysmal. A project over ten years in the making, Travolta has poured his heart and soul into this venture. And many writers seem to take pleasure in the film's failure.

 I personally feel that Rotten Tomatoes is terrible for film criticism because an algorithm will never capture the nuances that build an opinion. With that being said most of the controversy surrounding GOTTI is on that oddly valuable RT score.




Movie goes have been far kinder to the film giving it mostly positive reviews. Some critics have responded to this with humor.




But others see a darker reason for the disparate views.



This is where it gets strange. Some online writers have started to say that the people involved with GOTTI are artificially inflating the numbers. With no evidence, they are claiming fraud? Again I don't think this type of writing speaks to any sort of conspiracy, but rather a lack of integrity on the part of the writer. 


Last year film critics got all worked up when one writer had the nerve to give LADYBIRD a negative review. The film had one of the longest runs at 100% on the Tomatometer and the vast majority of online critics wanted to see it stay that way. They all seemed to love the story behind a film being universally praised. The little indie movie that could. It's great that everyone was onboard for supporting a truly special independent film, but that impulse is far removed from criticism. It's the hivemind nonsense that we see from DC fanboys and the make STAR WARS great again crowd.


Universal praise and condemnation both make me equally skeptical. In the case of GOTTI, I have no problem believing 75% of audiences liked it. But when it gets 0% from the critics, it just seems off. Travolta insisted the film have a theatrical run in hopes for an awards campaign. Can he be that confident and the movie be that bad? I guess it's possible, but to be perfectly honest when all the critics agree it starts to sound like they are listening to each other instead of doing their jobs. Its the inverse of the LADYBIRD phenomenon.

One last thing, critics, and audiences often have drastically different reactions to films, this is nothing new. GOTTI isn't blazing a new trail on this one. Some random examples below. Who do you think got it right, the critics or the audiences?












Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Explaining the Ending of MULHOLLAND DRIVE

By
MULHOLLAND DRIVE is a complex and surreal film directed by David Lynch, known for its non-linear narrative and dreamlike sequences. The ending is open to interpretation and has been the subject of much debate among viewers. Here's a breakdown of the ending: Diane's Dream vs. Reality: Throughout the film, there are two main narrative threads: one follows Betty/Diane's dreamlike experiences in Hollywood, and the other delves into Diane's harsh reality. The ending reveals that the majority of the film has been a dream constructed by Diane Selwyn, a failed actress, as a means to escape the guilt and pain of her actions. Betty/Diane's Descent into Madness: Betty, played by Naomi Watts, represents Diane's idealized self—a hopeful and innocent aspiring actress. However, as the film progresses, it becomes clear that Betty's story is unraveling, and her identity begins to merge with Diane's. This culminates in the revelation that Betty is merely a construct of Di...
Read More

Final Destination Bloodlines Set to Bring Fresh Horrors to the Franchise

By
The long-running and fan-favorite horror series Final Destination is set to make its return with Final Destination Bloodlines, bringing a new chapter of supernatural terror to the big screen. Scheduled for a theatrical and IMAX release on May 16, 2025, in the U.S. (and internationally beginning May 14), the film promises to continue the franchise’s tradition of chilling premonitions and inescapable fate. The upcoming installment features a fresh ensemble cast, including Kaitlyn Santa Juana (The Friendship Game, The Flash), Teo Briones (Chucky, Will vs. The Future), Richard Harmon (The 100, The Age of Adaline), Owen Patrick Joyner (Julie and the Phantoms, 100 Things to Do Before High School), and Anna Lore (They/Them, Gotham Knights). Also joining the cast are Brec Bassinger (Stargirl, Bella and the Bulldogs) and horror icon Tony Todd, who reprises his role from the original Final Destination films. Todd, best known for his chilling portrayal of the titular character in the Candyman fra...
Read More

4K Blu-ray Review: Drop (2025) — A Tense, Tech-Driven Thriller That Mostly Sticks the Landing

By
In Drop, director Christopher Landon (Freaky, Happy Death Day) crafts a nerve-wracking thriller centered on a devastating dilemma: would you take a life to save the ones you love? The story follows Violet, a widowed single mom attempting to re-enter the dating world after years of grief and recovery. Played with emotional precision by Meghann Fahy, Violet finds herself on a promising first date with the affable and seemingly genuine Henry (Brandon Sklenar) in an elegant, glass-walled Chicago restaurant. But their evening takes a sinister turn when Violet receives a disturbing message via a sleek, anonymous app called DigiDrop: if she doesn’t kill her date before the check arrives, her son and sister will die. What unfolds is a tightly wound 95-minute thriller that feels both classic and timely. The film builds its suspense through confinement, not action. Most of the story unfolds in real-time at their dinner table, creating a pressure-cooker environment that reflects Violet’s psycholo...
Read More