Skip to main content

Watson: Season One – The Doctor Steps Into the Spotlight

Watson Season 1 DVD Review

The first season of Watson arrives with a premise both ambitious and unusual. Rather than recycling the countless retellings of Sherlock Holmes, the show pivots away from the famous detective and asks what happens when his steadfast partner steps out of the shadows. With Sherlock presumed dead, Dr. John Watson inherits not only grief and lingering trauma but also the opportunity to shape a new path. He channels his medical background into founding a clinic that specializes in cases no one else can solve. It is part hospital, part detective bureau, and part personal experiment in healing. This setup establishes a tone that is darker and more contemplative than many of its network-drama peers, though it still relies on the familiar rhythms of weekly medical puzzles.

Morris Chestnut, as Watson, is the undeniable centerpiece. His version of the character is confident but visibly scarred, navigating both the practical challenges of running a medical institute and the psychological weight of surviving his closest friend. Chestnut grounds the role in warmth and steadiness, qualities that help humanize a man who could otherwise be consumed by stoicism. At moments when the writing leans too heavily on melodrama or overcomplicated diagnoses, his performance is what keeps the show tethered. His Watson is neither a carbon copy of previous interpretations nor a radical reinvention; rather, he comes across as someone wrestling with identity in the absence of the brilliant mind who once defined him.

The supporting cast adds variety, though not always with equal depth. Ingrid Derian, the neurologist who joins the clinic, hides a guarded past that slowly unravels over the season. Sasha Lubbock, the immunologist, struggles with dual family identities that threaten her credibility. The twin specialists Stephens and Adam Croft bring an eccentric dynamic that oscillates between comic relief and genuine tension. These figures are designed to echo the quirky ensembles of earlier medical dramas, though at times they lean too far into archetypes. Still, when the show allows them quieter moments—conversations about their fears, sacrifices, or loyalties—they feel more authentic.

Rochelle Aytes plays Mary Morstan, Watson’s estranged wife, whose presence injects both emotional realism and an undercurrent of unresolved love. Her role is not always central, but whenever she appears, the show steadies itself. Randall Park’s turn as Moriarty, however, takes the series in a surprising direction. The absence of Holmes leaves space for the infamous adversary to step forward, and his encounters with Watson create some of the most suspenseful sequences of the season. It is here, when the writers lean into tension rather than exposition, that the show hints at its true potential.

The cases themselves are the engine of the series, and they swing between ingenious and overloaded. Across the twelve episodes, the clinic confronts rare genetic syndromes, neurological puzzles, and baffling infections. One patient’s misdiagnosed insomnia spirals into tragedy when linked to a hidden familial disorder. Another suffers from sudden amnesia that resets every few minutes, forcing the team to work against time while questioning what identity means without memory. Alien hand syndrome, Huntington’s masquerades, and ethically fraught experimental surgeries push both the doctors and the viewers into unfamiliar territory. At their best, these cases showcase a blend of detective reasoning and medical knowledge, giving the show its unique flavor. At their weakest, they feel like they have been plucked from a medical textbook, stacked too high, and rushed through without breathing room.

Stylistically, the series favors a moody aesthetic. The clinic is dimly lit, filled with sleek glass and sterile surfaces, reflecting Watson’s struggle to keep emotions contained. The score heightens this somber mood, though at times the music borders on heavy-handed. Direction varies from episode to episode, with certain installments embracing sharp visual metaphors—such as a patient wandering endless corridors mirroring Watson’s own disorientation—while others retreat into standard procedural framing. The inconsistency makes the season feel uneven, but the ambition is clear.

One of the more intriguing layers is how the show reimagines Holmes himself. Though physically absent, his influence hovers over every choice Watson makes. The clinic is built with Sherlock’s funding, the cases carry echoes of his deductive style, and the antagonists often seem shaped by grudges from his world. This ghostly presence allows the story to explore grief in unusual ways. Rather than treat Holmes as a mythic hero, the show frames him as both inspiration and burden. Watson, for perhaps the first time, has to define himself outside of that shadow. It is a refreshing angle, even if not always smoothly executed.

The pacing of the season reflects the dual identity of the show. On one hand, it wants to function as a weekly medical drama where each case is introduced, unraveled, and resolved. On the other, it pushes toward serialized storytelling, especially through the Moriarty arc and Watson’s gradual recovery from trauma. The two modes do not always blend seamlessly. Some episodes feel like isolated puzzles with minimal emotional payoff, while others tilt so heavily toward personal drama that the medical mystery feels secondary. When the balance does work—when a case mirrors Watson’s inner struggles—the result can be poignant and memorable.

What stands out most after twelve episodes is not the intricacy of the medical puzzles or even the suspense of the Moriarty conflict, but the portrait of a man stepping into his own story. The series takes a figure who has long been defined by his partnership with Sherlock Holmes and asks whether he can function, lead, and inspire on his own terms. The answer, at least in this first season, is imperfect but promising. The writing occasionally stumbles under the weight of too many ideas, yet there is an earnestness in its execution. The themes of grief, reinvention, and ethical decision-making give it substance beyond the procedural formula.

As a whole, Watson season one is watchable, sometimes gripping, and occasionally frustrating. It thrives when it slows down, gives its characters space, and ties its medical cases to emotional stakes. It falters when it overcomplicates, forcing diagnoses and twists that feel contrived. Still, the central performance by Morris Chestnut carries the show with authority, ensuring that even when the story wobbles, the heart remains intact. By the season’s conclusion, Watson emerges not just as a doctor solving impossible cases but as a man redefining himself, carving out an identity beyond the great detective he once followed. The result is a drama that may not yet fulfill all its ambitions but leaves enough intrigue and humanity to suggest there is more worth exploring in seasons to come.

Season 1 of Watson will be available on DVD on 9/23

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explaining the Ending of MULHOLLAND DRIVE

MULHOLLAND DRIVE is a complex and surreal film directed by David Lynch, known for its non-linear narrative and dreamlike sequences. The ending is open to interpretation and has been the subject of much debate among viewers. Here's a breakdown of the ending: Diane's Dream vs. Reality: Throughout the film, there are two main narrative threads: one follows Betty/Diane's dreamlike experiences in Hollywood, and the other delves into Diane's harsh reality. The ending reveals that the majority of the film has been a dream constructed by Diane Selwyn, a failed actress, as a means to escape the guilt and pain of her actions. Betty/Diane's Descent into Madness: Betty, played by Naomi Watts, represents Diane's idealized self—a hopeful and innocent aspiring actress. However, as the film progresses, it becomes clear that Betty's story is unraveling, and her identity begins to merge with Diane's. This culminates in the revelation that Betty is merely a construct of Di...

Final Destination Bloodlines Set to Bring Fresh Horrors to the Franchise

The long-running and fan-favorite horror series Final Destination is set to make its return with Final Destination Bloodlines, bringing a new chapter of supernatural terror to the big screen. Scheduled for a theatrical and IMAX release on May 16, 2025, in the U.S. (and internationally beginning May 14), the film promises to continue the franchise’s tradition of chilling premonitions and inescapable fate. The upcoming installment features a fresh ensemble cast, including Kaitlyn Santa Juana (The Friendship Game, The Flash), Teo Briones (Chucky, Will vs. The Future), Richard Harmon (The 100, The Age of Adaline), Owen Patrick Joyner (Julie and the Phantoms, 100 Things to Do Before High School), and Anna Lore (They/Them, Gotham Knights). Also joining the cast are Brec Bassinger (Stargirl, Bella and the Bulldogs) and horror icon Tony Todd, who reprises his role from the original Final Destination films. Todd, best known for his chilling portrayal of the titular character in the Candyman fra...

LOCKED Release Info

LOCKED follows Eddie (Bill Skarsgård), a desperate man who breaks into a seemingly empty luxury SUV, only to find himself ensnared in a meticulously crafted trap. His captor? William (Anthony Hopkins), a vigilante with a twisted sense of justice. What starts as a simple break-in quickly spirals into a nightmare, as Eddie struggles to escape a vehicle designed to be his prison. With no way out and an unseen force pulling the strings, survival becomes a race against time in a ride where justice is anything but blind. This 95-minute thrill ride promises to keep audiences on edge by blending elements of survival horror and psychological warfare. Its confined setting turns an everyday luxury vehicle into an inescapable nightmare, and the ride explores themes of morality, punishment, and the true cost of justice. Only in Theaters on March 21. I love a limited-setting horror thriller. With limited settings, the film must rely more on character interactions and internal conflicts to create ten...